Home
Our Company
About
Why Bridge PTS?
Getting Started
Collaborators
Licenses
BRIDGE PTS Cited Publications
Services
Wound Healing
Infection Control & Biofilms
Customized Surgical Work
Our Facility
Posters
Events
Blog
Contact Us
Search

Bridge PTS

Home
Our Company
About
Why Bridge PTS?
Getting Started
Collaborators
Licenses
BRIDGE PTS Cited Publications
Services
Wound Healing
Infection Control & Biofilms
Customized Surgical Work
Our Facility
Posters
Events
Blog
Contact Us
Search
  • Biofilm & Microbiology Testing
  • Rodent Lung Infection Animal Model
  • Rodent Implantable Biofilm Coated Devices
  • Rabbit Foley Catheter/Urinary Infection
  • Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) / Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)
  • Time Kill (TK)
  • Zone of Clearance/Inhibition (ZOC/ZOI)
  • Simple (Single Species) Biofilms
  • Complex (Multi-Species) Biofilms
  • Live-Dead Staining
  • Electron Microscopy
  • Tensile Testing (BF)
  • Rabbit Peritoneal Implant Model
  • Rabbit Vaginal Mucosal Irritation Model

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) / Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

  • Duration of study – 72 hours

  • Lead time - 14 days

  • Standard results – Microbiology


MODEL UTILITY:

This in vitro antimicrobial assay is typically used as an initial screening to determine possible antimicrobial activity of novel materials.  This assay determines the lowest concentration of the novel material that still shows antimicrobial activity.

HOW THE MODEL WORKS:

In this assay, the test material is serially diluted, typically a doubling dilution, in a growth medium.  Then an aliquot of prepared bacterial solution is added to each dilution in the series.  The dilutions are then incubated overnight, and then observed for turbidity.  The dilution with the lowest concentration of the test material that exhibits no turbidity is determined to be the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC).

An aliquot is taken from each dilution in the series that exhibited no growth and is further diluted, typically a hundred-fold dilution, in fresh growth medium.  These new hundred-fold dilutions are then incubated overnight and observed for turbidity.  The lowest concentration of the test material in the first dilution series that correlated with the hundred-fold dilution that exhibits no turbidity is determined to be the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). 

EXAMPLE DATA:

This data is from a study comparing several formulations of a novel surgical rinse to a predicate device, povidone iodine.  The test organism for this study was Staphylococcus aureus.

Table 1. This table compares the results of the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) testing for povidone iodine and two test materials. This table indicates no turbidity with a “-” and turbidity with a “+”. The minimum inhibition concentration fo…

Table 1. This table compares the results of the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) testing for povidone iodine and two test materials. This table indicates no turbidity with a “-” and turbidity with a “+”. The minimum inhibition concentration for povidone iodine was determined to be 0.63% povidone iodine. The minimum inhibition concentration for Test Solution 1 and Test Solution 2 were determined be 17.5 mM and 6.25 mM, respectively.

Table 2. This table compares the results of the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) testing for povidone iodine and two test materials. This table indicates no turbidity with a “-” and turbidity with a “+”. The minimum bactericidal concentratio…

Table 2. This table compares the results of the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) testing for povidone iodine and two test materials. This table indicates no turbidity with a “-” and turbidity with a “+”. The minimum bactericidal concentration for povidone iodine was determined to be 0.63% povidone iodine. The minimum bactericidal concentration for Test Solution 1 and Test Solution 2 were determined be 35 mM and 25 mM, respectively.

Figure 1. Example photographs of minimum inhibition concentration serial dilutions. The dilution factor is indicated on the yellow bar. (A) Serial dilution of povidone iodine with the turbidity beginning at the 5th dilution. (B) Serial dilution of T…

Figure 1. Example photographs of minimum inhibition concentration serial dilutions. The dilution factor is indicated on the yellow bar. (A) Serial dilution of povidone iodine with the turbidity beginning at the 5th dilution. (B) Serial dilution of Test Solution 1 with the turbidity beginning at the 3rd dilution. (C) Serial dilution of Test Solution 2 with the turbidity beginning at the 4th dilution.

Advantages:

This model is inexpensive and allows for high throughput screening of novel materials.   This model also provides insight into potential starting points for the concentration of the novel materials in formulations to be used for in vivo testing.

Disadvantages:

This in vitro model does not consistently predict anti-microbial activity when the material is used in an in vivo model, as is common with many in vitro tests.

Back to Top

BRIDGE PTS, Inc., Brooks City-Base, San Antonio, TX 78235, P: 210-532-7344